Windows Central: “Lenovo’s folding Yoga Book C930 features the first E Ink keyboard”

The real magic, though, is the lower 10.8-inch full HD E Ink display that also doubles as a keyboard or notepad. That keyboard can change between keyboard layouts on the fly to accommodate different regions and languages.

To address the virtual-ness, Lenovo has the buttons slightly shift when typing to simulate movement. When combined with haptic feedback (vibration) and audio cues (both of which are configurable), typing on the Yoga Book is much better than the previous Halo Keyboard. While it is not nearly as good as a “real” typing experience, it is getting closer.

Another neat feature is the trackpad. The virtual one appears when you tap the dot below the spacebar, giving you a decently large target for moving the cursor. To save space, however, that trackpad goes away when you start to type and turns back into a spacebar.

Daniel Rubino

That’s a very interesting innovation, one I hope to see in more portable devices in the future. Having a ‘virtual’ keyboard that can adapt to different languages is very useful to people working in multi-lingual environments. While you can currently change keyboard layouts in Windows, this (obviously) cannot update the actual keys in front of you, so you still need to remember where each key goes in the secondary layouts. It’s especially difficult with special characters, as each language has its own ideas where various symbols should go, and which are important enough to be featured on hardware keys. An e-ink keyboard would make this so much easier!

ScienceDaily: “Forty percent of people have a fictional first memory”

Current research indicates that people’s earliest memories date from around three to three-and-a-half years of age. However, the study from researchers at City, University of London, the University of Bradford and Nottingham Trent University found that 38.6 per cent of a survey of 6,641 people claimed to have memories from two or younger, with 893 people claiming memories from one or younger. This was particularly prevalent among middle-aged and older adults.

City University London

One of my oldest memories is a vague recollection of attending the funeral of my maternal grandmother – except… she died well before I was even born! It’s probably one of these cases when my mother spoke about it so many times, that my mind started forming images around the story as if I were actually there.

Except for a couple fragments, I have a very poor memory of my childhood, so I generally assume the few events I recall are so distorted by the passage of time as to be completely unreliable.

Ars Technica: “London museum is livestreaming a key 21st-century artifact—festering sewage”

The rancid refuse was chipped off an infamous sewer clog discovered in London late last year called the Whitechapel “Fatberg”—the preferred term for such muck monsters. The complete clog clocked in as an epic 250-meter-long, 130-metric ton mass of congealed excrement and waste, thought to be one of the largest—if not the largest—fatbergs ever identified. Authorities found it blocking a Victorian-era sewer line in the eastern Whitechapel area of the city. They spent nine long weeks in a subterranean war, hacking and blasting away the hardened blob of feces, fats, wet wipes, and various other detritus.

As Thames Water authorities donned biohazard suits to do battle in the bowels of the city using pressure hoses and shovels, curators at the Museum of London smelled a fresh opportunity to document our times.

Beth Mole

When I first visited Hamburg, way back in the 20th century, there was a strange exhibit in the Modern Art Museum: a sculpture made from chocolate, housed in a transparent box, and kept there in plain sight of the visitors, as the chocolate decayed and crumbled, slowly changing the shape of the original – presumably reminding passersby of the passage of time and the futility of life (or something deep like that). This story instantly reminded me of that.

The Outline: “If you message first in online dating, you might be punching above your weight”

According to research published Wednesday in Science Advances, people tend to initiate online conversation with people who are at least 25 percent more desirable than they are, based on how many initial messages they they received from other users and how “desirable” those users were themselves. Men tend to be even more aspirational than women when sending a first message. But there is only up to a 21 percent chance that the woman a man messages will write back, and that number drops as the desirability gap widens.

The paper analyzed data from heterosexual users of an unspecified “popular, free online dating service” in New York, Boston, Chicago, and Seattle from January of 2014. The highest ranked person in all four cities was a 30-year-old woman in New York City, who received 1504 messages during the period of observation, the equivalent of one message every 30 minutes for the entire month.

Livia Albeck-Ripka

Seems like a fairly obvious conclusion: the laws of evolution and sexual selection encourage individuals to leave behind offspring better adapted than the parents. And so, we are (consciously or unconsciously) seeking out partners that we perceive to be ‘better’ than us on some level, in the hope that out children may inherit their qualities (and ours).

Wil Wheaton dot Net: “The world is a terrible place right now, and that’s largely because it is what we make it”

I thought that if I left Twitter, I could find a new social network that would give it some competition (Twitter’s monopoly on the social space is a big reason it can ignore people who are abused and harassed, while punishing people for reporting their attackers), so I fired up this account I made at Mastodon a long time ago.

I thought I’d find something different. I thought I’d find a smaller community that was more like Twitter was way back in 2008 or 2009. Cat pictures! Jokes! Links to interesting things that we found in the backwaters of the internet! Interaction with friends we just haven’t met, yet! What I found was… not that.

I found a harsh reality that I’m still trying to process: thousands of people who don’t know me, who have never interacted with me, who internalized a series of lies about me, who were never willing to give me a chance. I was harassed from the minute I made my account, and though I expected the “shut up wesley”s and “go fuck yourself”s to taper off after a day or so, it never did. And even though I never broke any rules on the server I joined (Mastodon is individual “instances” which is like a server, which connects to the “federated timeline”, which is what all the other servers are), one of its admins told me they were suspending my account, because they got 60 (!) reports overnight about my account, and they didn’t want to deal with the drama.

Wil Wheaton

I’m very behind with the articles I plan to share on my blog, but hopefully the upcoming month will allow me to catch up a bit.

Anyway, a month ago (which is equivalent to roughly a century in Twitter years), there was a brief protest movement on Twitter over their slow reaction to block Alex Jones and Infowars. People threatened to quit Twitter and move to Mastodon, one of the recent wannabe micro-blogging sites. Not surprisingly, some found the medium just as toxic as Twitter, if not more. This just goes to show how difficult it is to maintain a healthy and safe environment in public, while interacting with people from all over the world under anonymous identities (not to mention bots, but I assume Mastodon is too small to have that problem yet). Many of the cases when Twitter does act are enforced by legislation (as it’s the case in Germany with blocking far-right propaganda), so the best way to improve social media is not to quit or to take your chances on another site, but to demand better regulation of online spaces. As with GDPR, smarter regulation from one part of the world could eventually influence platforms to adopt it for their entire user base.

Wired: “Inside Facebook’s Two Years of Hell”

News outfits were spending millions to produce stories that Facebook was benefiting from, and Facebook, they felt, was giving too little back in return. Instant Articles, in particular, struck them as a Trojan horse. Publishers complained that they could make more money from stories that loaded on their own mobile web pages than on Facebook Instant. (They often did so, it turned out, in ways that short-changed advertisers, by sneaking in ads that readers were unlikely to see. Facebook didn’t let them get away with that.) Another seemingly irreconcilable difference: Outlets like Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal depended on paywalls to make money, but Instant Articles banned paywalls; Zuckerberg disapproved of them. After all, he would often ask, how exactly do walls and toll booths make the world more open and connected?

Nicholas Thompson & Fred Vogelstein

Throughout history, walls were not built primarily to keep good people in, but rather to keep bad people out. When your tear down defenses, you invite in all sorts of negative elements – and that’s precisely what’s happened (and is still happening) on Facebook. Having grown up during one of the most peaceful times in human history, in one of the places on Earth best sheltered against violence and strife, it’s no wonder Mark Zuckerberg has trouble understanding such threats.

The Guardian: “The war against Pope Francis”

Last year, one cardinal, backed by a few retired colleagues, raised the possibility of a formal declaration of heresy – the wilful rejection of an established doctrine of the church, a sin punishable by excommunication. Last month, 62 disaffected Catholics, including one retired bishop and a former head of the Vatican bank, published an open letter that accused Francis of seven specific counts of heretical teaching.

To accuse a sitting pope of heresy is the nuclear option in Catholic arguments. Doctrine holds that the pope cannot be wrong when he speaks on the central questions of the faith; so if he is wrong, he can’t be pope. On the other hand, if this pope is right, all his predecessors must have been wrong.

The question is particularly poisonous because it is almost entirely theoretical. In practice, in most of the world, divorced and remarried couples are routinely offered communion. Pope Francis is not proposing a revolution, but the bureaucratic recognition of a system that already exists, and might even be essential to the survival of the church. If the rules were literally applied, no one whose marriage had failed could ever have sex again. This is not a practical way to ensure there are future generations of Catholics.

Andrew Brown

Interesting long read on a subject I haven’t closely followed, but seems relevant for the current struggles of the Catholic Church. To me, Catholicism has always seemed more restrictive than other Christian churches on many subjects, including the right of priests to marry and, as mentioned in the article, divorce, which I find especially strange for a faith that considers itself ‘universal’. By contrast, Orthodox priests are not allowed into office if they are not married – to set the proper example for their parish. The Orthodox Church is more lenient when it comes to divorce as well, defining a fairly narrow list of cases when it’s permitted.