Showing posts with label Social. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social. Show all posts

09 December 2025

Windows Latest: “Meta just killed native WhatsApp on Windows 11, now it opens WebView, uses 1GB RAM all the time”

WhatsApp on Windows 11 has just got a ‘major’ upgrade, and you’re probably going to hate it because it simply loads web.whatsapp.com in a WebView2 container. This means WhatsApp on Windows 11 is cooked, and it’s back to being absolute garbage in terms of performance.

WhatsApp is one of those Windows apps that went from being a web wrapper to a native app and then back to the web again after all these years of investment.


An app can use a lot of memory, and it does not necessarily mean it’s a performance nightmare, but the issue with the new WhatsApp is that it feels sluggish. You’re going to notice sluggish performance, long loading time, and other performance issues when browsing different conversations.

We also noticed that it does not work well with Windows notifications. It also struggles with Windows 11’s Do Not Disturb mode or Active Hours. And there are delayed notifications problems as well.

Mayank Parmar

While reading about this update I initially doubted it was as bad as people feared, since people do tend to exaggerate things online for dramatic purposes. But after the update reached one of my devices, I get what everyone was complaining about, and I feel compelled to join in!

20 August 2025

Reuters: “Meta’s AI rules have let bots hold ‘sensual’ chats with children”

An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company’s artificial intelligence creations to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual, generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are dumber than white people.

These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI, and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram, the company’s social-media platforms.

Meta confirmed the document’s authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children.

Jeff Horwitz

Despicable, even by Facebook’s abysmal standards. I was browsing my blog to link to examples of their horrible past behaviors, and the list just kept getting longer and longer!

15 August 2025

The Verge: “Instagram adds a reposts feed and rips off Snap Maps”

Starting today, users will have the ability to repost public Reels and grid posts from other accounts. And similar to TikTok, reposts will be collected in a designated tab on your profile and sprinkled into the feeds of people who follow you. It’s a small but meaningful shift from how Instagram currently operates: until now, the most efficient way to share other users’ content was to repost it on your Instagram Story. Now, you can essentially reblog it.

Instagram is also pulling from Snapchat and adding an opt-in location map that lives in your private messages. The map shows the last active location for friends who have opted in to the feature; it also pulls content from specific locations, such as a music festival, where many people are posting from. It’s the Snap Map but redesigned for Instagram.

Mia Sato

I first rolled my eyes reading about this update – yet another feature nobody asked for added to the pile of bloat on Instagram. And yet after I saw it in the app, I instantly liked it. Maybe because I spend so much time on Twitter – who initially introduced this idea, despite the tech press going out of their way to ignore that fact nowadays – it felt instantly familiar and natural.

06 July 2025

The Cut: “Why Don’t We Dream about Our Smartphones?”

I asked Alice Robb, author of the forthcoming book Why We Dream: The Transformative Power of Our Nightly Journey, to explain our phones’ relative absence from our dreams, and she introduced me to what’s called the “threat simulation hypothesis” of dreaming. [This theory] basically suggests that the reason why we dream is that dreams allow us to work through our anxieties and our fears in a more low-risk environment, so we’re able to practice for stressful events, says Robb. This hypothesis also posits that because our dreams are an evolved defense mechanism, we tend to dream more often about fears and concerns that were relevant to our ancestors — so, less about, say, hacking, and more about running from wild animals. People tend not to dream quite as much about reading and writing, which are more recent developments in human history, and more about survival related things, like fighting, even if that has nothing to do with who you are in real life, says Robb.

While the threat simulation hypothesis can be interpreted to support the tweet that started this whole thing, Robb tells me there’s also evidence to suggest it’s not totally accurate. (Shocking.) For instance, analyzing data from more than 16,000 dream reports, researchers have shown that cell phones appear in 3.55 percent of women’s dreams (and 2.69 percent of men’s) — not a huge number, but it’s higher than the frequency with which movies (3.18 percent), computers (1.2 percent), and airplanes (1.49 percent) appear in our dreams.

Katie Heaney

I’ve never really thought about this before seeing someone share a LinkedIn article on the topic, but I have also never dreamt about my smartphone! Or at least I don’t recall in case I have.

14 January 2025

Ars Technica: “Mastodon’s founder cedes control, refuses to become next Musk or Zuckerberg”

The news comes after leaders of other social networks, like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, have sparked backlash over sudden changes to popular apps like Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter). For years, Musk has drawn criticism for changing Twitter's hate speech policies through his X rebranding. And more recently, Zuckerberg this month defended Meta’s decision to relax hate speech policies (permitting women to be called “property” and gay people to be called “mentally ill”) by calling bans on such speech out of touch with mainstream discourse.

Mastodon is hoping to provide an alternative social network for users who are potentially frustrated with their lack of control over their timelines and content on other networks.

But to achieve the envisioned independence for all users, Mastodon’s structure needed to evolve, the blog said, as the community grew to about 1.5 million monthly active users in 2023. Remaining headquartered in Europe primarily, Mastodon’s day-to-day operations will be managed by the new European not-for-profit entity, establishing a new legal home for Mastodon.

Ashley Belanger

Good intentions, but there is already precedent of a company starting out as a nonprofit with good intentions on paper, only to succumb to investor pressure once its product became a hit – on course, I’m talking about OpenAI.

07 January 2025

The Washington Post: “In online drone panic, conspiracy thinking has gone mainstream”

However, more than a million drones are lawfully registered with the FAA, including thousands of commercial, hobbyist and law enforcement drones lawfully in the sky on any given day, the joint statement said. With the technology landscape evolving, we expect that number to increase over time.

The Defense Department has said unidentified drones have long been a common problem close to military bases. In addition to perfectly legal drones, the sightings probably involve misidentified airplanes, other agencies have said.

Indeed, Nelson Delgado, the Newark FBI office’s acting special agent in charge, issued a video Monday warning of an increase in pilots of manned aircraft being hit in the eyes with lasers because people on the ground think they see a drone.


Even some politicians have been caught up in the online fervor. Former Maryland governor Larry Hogan (R) — who recently lost a campaign for U.S. Senate — posted a video on X last week showing what he said were drones flying over his house. They turned out to be stars in the constellation Orion, according to Washington Post meteorologist Matthew Cappucci.

Sen. Andy Kim (D-New Jersey) posted a long thread on X describing strange lights he saw during a ride-along with local police. A day later, he clarified that after further research, he’d concluded that what he saw was probably an airplane.

Tatum Hunter

Whenever online chatter about UFOs flares up, I chuckle to myself remembering how basically every time Venus becomes bright in the evening sky there’s renewed reports of people mistaking it for a UFO. My personal explanation (without invoking aliens or other unexplained phenomena, which are certainly possible, but overall unlikely) is that enough people are both sufficiently ignorant about their environment and self-absorbed to think that their first reaction is the real explanation of what they’re seeing and they need to instantly share it with others to prove their insight. A perfect breeding ground for conspiracy theories.

13 August 2024

Mashable: “Elon Musk’s X lets users sort replies to find more relevant comments”

The latter two reply sorting options are pretty straightforward. “Most recent” shows replies in chronological order from newest to oldest. “Most liked” shows the replies with most likes first. Blue check accounts appear to have completely lost any advantage that the paid subscription provided them when selecting either of these two menu options.

It’s unclear exactly how X is determining how to sort posts via the “most relevant” option. However, it appears to be the same sorting method as the previous default. Blue checks do still appear to be prioritized in this view.

Any user can change the reply sorting options on any post that they view, not just their own posts.

Matt Binder

I’ve noticed this change a few days before this article, first on the Twitter web site, later in the Android app as well. Slightly impressive that the company is now shipping features simultaneously on the web and in its apps, whereas for years the standard for most tech giants was to test and launch features on iOS first, with the web and Android distant seconds. A lack of polish is however manifest in small details like different labels for the choices on the web and in apps (in the Android app, ‘Most relevant’ is called ‘Trending replies’). Unfortunately, this new feature is per post rather than saved globally on your account, meaning you can’t (yet?) choose your preferred reply sorting setting and have it automatically applied on each reply section, instead you need to switch modes on each new tweet.